Sesgo de publicación: ¿qué pueden hacer las revistas científicas?

Eduard Baladia, Rodrigo Martínez-Rodríguez

Palabras clave

Sesgo de publicación; Conflictos de interés; Revista científica;

Texto completo:



(1) Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ, Reporting Bias Group. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias an updated review. PloS One. 2013; 8(7): e66844.

(2) Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (1): MR000006.

(3) Onishi A, Furukawa TA. Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high–impact–factor journals: metaepidemiologic study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67(12): 1320–6.

(4) Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc OA, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 12: MR000033.

(5) Als–Nielsen B, Chen W, Gluud C, Kjaergard LL. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? JAMA. 2003; 290(7): 921–8.

(6) Malički M, Marušić A. Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67(10): 1103–10.

(7) Kien C, Nußbaumer B, Thaler KJ, Griebler U, Van Noord MG, Wagner P, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 551.

(8) Chapman S, Eisinga A, Hopewell S, Clarke M. Two–thirds of methodological research remained unpublished after presentation at Cochrane Colloquia: an empirical analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012; 65(5): 493–6.

(9) Song F, Parekh–Bhurke S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder JJ, Sutton AJ, et al. Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta–analysis of empirical studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9: 79.

(10) Lundh A, Barbateskovic M, Hróbjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC. Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry–supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue cohort study. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(10): e1000354.

(11) Handel AE, Patel SV, Pakpoor J, Ebers GC, Goldacre B, Ramagopalan SV. High reprint orders in medical journals and pharmaceutical industry funding: case–control study. BMJ. 2012; 344: e4212.

(12) van Lent M, Overbeke J, Out HJ. Role of Editorial and Peer Review Processes in Publication Bias: Analysis of Drug Trials Submitted to Eight Medical Journals. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 12 de agosto de 2014 [citado 30 de septiembre de 2015]; 9(8). Recuperado a partir de:

(13) Thaler K, Kien C, Nussbaumer B, Van Noord MG, Griebler U, Klerings I, et al. Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68(7): 792–802.

(14) Rezaeian M. Reducing publication bias in biomedical research: reviewing and registering protocol with a suitable journal. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; in Press.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.

Copyright (c)


Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.

Esta revista ha conseguido la validación para ser Data Provider OAI-PMH version 2.0 de Open Archives Initiative (OAI)

ISSN (online): 2174-5145 / ISSN (print): 2173-1292

Abreviatura: Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet

DOI revista: 10.14306/renhyd





Twitter: (@renhyd_org)



Indexada en:





Cooperación entre revistas iberoamericanas de nutrición humana:

Perspectivas en Nutrición Humana



¿Quién nos visita?