Comparison of different anthropometric measures in women aged 60-75 by physical activity

Authors

  • Yeny Concha-Cisternas Universidad Tecnológica de Chile INACAP. Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca
  • Pablo Valdés-Badilla Instituto de Actividad Física y Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile. Facultad de Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, sede Temuco
  • Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás
  • Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo Departamento de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.21.3.367

Keywords:

Body Composition, Anthropometry, Aged, Women, Exercise.

Abstract

Introduction: the objective of this study was to compare the anthropometric markers of health body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and body fat percentage (BFP) among physically active (PA) and physically inactive (PI) older women.

Material and methods: cross-sectional descriptive study with 88 women aged 60-75 years old. The evaluations were carried out in the biomechanics laboratory of the Universidad Santo Tomás (Chile), and  included measurements of body weight, bipedal stature, CC and cutaneous folds. BMI (kg/m2) and percentage of GC were calculated from the skin folds.

Results: PA older women presented significantly lower values than IF in the anthropometric health markers evaluated: percentage of CG (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.04) and WC (p = 0.03). However, both groups obtained CC and GC values above healthy recommendations. A BMI of 29.76 kg/m2 and 26.8 kg/m2 was obtained for PI and PA, respectively. According to these values, PI were classified as overweight, while PA were classified as normal. When comparing skinfolds, it was observed than PA had values significantly lower than PI in triceps (p=0.03), subscapular (p=0.005) and suprailiac (p=0.001) folds.

Conclusions: older women with PA show favorable BMI, WC, and BFP with respect to PI, which could indicate that regular physical activity would be a beneficial element in the health of older adults.

Author Biography

Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz, Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás

Profesor asistente, Escuela de Kinesiología, Universidad Santo Tomás, Talca, Chile,

References

(1) Organización Mundial de la Salud. Estadísticas sanitarias mundiales 2011 [Internet]. Ginebra: OMS; 2011. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/ES_WHS2011_Full.pdf

(2) Atlantis E, Martin SA, Haren MT, Taylor AW, Wittert GA, Florey Adelaide Male Aging Study. Lifestyle factors associated with age-related differences in body composition: the Florey Adelaide Male Aging Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(1):95-104.

(3) Tseng LA, Delmonico MJ, Visser M, Boudreau RM, Goodpaster BH, Schwartz AV, et al. Body composition explains sex differential in physical performance among older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(1):93-100.

(4) Fernández IE, Martínez AJ, García F, Díaz ME, Xiqués X. Evaluación nutricional antropométrica en ancianos. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr. 2005;21(1-2):0-0.

(5) Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Body mass index, waist circumference, and health risk: evidence in support of current National Institutes of Health guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(18):2074-9.

(6) Ortega FB, Sui X, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. Body Mass Index, the Most Widely Used But Also Widely Criticized Index: Would a Criterion Standard Measure of Total Body Fat Be a Better Predictor of Cardiovascular Disease Mortality? Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(4):443-55.

(7) Pouliot MC, Després JP, Lemieux S, Moorjani S, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, et al. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73(7):460-8.

(8) Dey DK, Rothenberg E, Sundh V, Bosaeus I, Steen B. Height and body weight in elderly adults: a 21-year population study on secular trends and related factors in 70-year-olds. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(12):M780-784.

(9) Dunsky A, Zach S, Zeev A, Goldbourt U, Shimony T, Goldsmith R, et al. Level of physical activity and anthropometric characteristics in old age—results from a national health survey. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2014;11(2):149-57.

(10) Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee I-M, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334-59.

(11) Subsecretaria de Salud Pública - Gobierno de Chile. Manual de Aplicación del Examen de Medicina Preventiva del Adulto Mayor [Internet]. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Salud; 2012. Disponible en: http://web.minsal.cl/portal/url/item/ab1f81f43ef0c2a6e04001011e011907.pdf

(12) Stewart A, Marfell-Jones M. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. ISAK, editor. Potchefstroom, Sudáfrica: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry; 2006.

(13) Durnin JV, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr. 1974;32(1):77-97.

(14) Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

(15) Lean ME, Han TS, Morrison CE. Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. BMJ. 1995;311(6998):158-61.

(16) Salas-Salvadó J, Rubio MA, Barbany M, Moreno B, Grupo Colaborativo de la SEEDO. Consenso SEEDO 2007 para la evaluación del sobrepeso y la obesidad y el establecimiento de criterios de intervención terapéutica. Med Clin. 2007;128(5):184-196; quiz 1 p following 200.

(17) Hughes VA, Roubenoff R, Wood M, Frontera WR, Evans WJ, Fiatarone Singh MA. Anthropometric assessment of 10-y changes in body composition in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(2):475-82.

(18) Perissinotto E, Pisent C, Sergi G, Grigoletto F, ILSA Working Group (Italian Longitudinal Study on Ageing). Anthropometric measurements in the elderly: age and gender differences. Br J Nutr. 2002;87(2):177-86.

(19) López M del MR, Gómez-Martín M, Rosado CI. Evaluación del índice de masa corporal con factores clínicos-nutricionales en ancianos institucionalizados sin deterioro cognitivo. Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética. 2016;20(4):298-306.

(20) Osuna-Padilla IA, Verdugo-Hernandez S, Leal-Escobar G, Ramirez IO. Estado nutricional en adultos mayores mexicanos: estudio comparativo entre grupos con distinta asistencia social. Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética. 2015;19(1):12-20.

(21) Chang S-H, Beason TS, Hunleth JM, Colditz GA. A systematic review of body fat distribution and mortality in older people. Maturitas. 2012;72(3):175-91.

Published

2017-10-27

How to Cite

Concha-Cisternas, Y., Valdés-Badilla, P., Guzmán-Muñoz, E., & Ramirez-Campillo, R. (2017). Comparison of different anthropometric measures in women aged 60-75 by physical activity. Spanish Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 21(3), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.21.3.367

Most read articles by the same author(s)