Evaluation of food labeling targeted to the vegetarian population in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.25.4.1351Keywords:
Diet, Vegetarian, Plant Proteins, Dietary, Nutritive Value, Food Labeling, Vegetable ProductsAbstract
Introduction: Foods marketed for the vegetarian population should provide the micronutrients that they are not taking for having removed the animal source products from their diets. The nutritional composition and other information necessary for making a proper selection of this type of products should be provided in the food labeling aimed for this population.
Objective: To evaluate the labeling of foods marketed for the vegetarian population in Colombia.
Materials and methods: Vegetarian meat-analog products, cheese substitutes, vegetable drinks and vegetable ice creams were purchased to estimate the compliance of the labeling items, analyze their declared nutritional composition and evaluate their nutrient profile. A product from each category was studied by means of physicochemical analysis methods, in order to contrast the results with the information reported in the nutritional labeling.
Results: 167 products were analyzed. It was found that 27% of the products did not comply to the basic regulatory guidelines of the labeling. In addition, 16.8% of these did not provide data on the intake of nutrients. In the composition, great differences were observed in the nutritional content of equivalent product categories. These foods were characterized by low values of calcium and iron and high values of sodium. Regarding the physicochemical contrast, there are variations greater than 50% from the information declared on the labels of several nutrients. Most vegetable drinks and ice creams were classified as unhealthy.
Conclusions: It is necessary to improve the nutritional composition of the products aimed at the vegetarian population, providing a greater amount of nutrients that are critical among this population.
References
Rosenfeld DL. A comparison of dietarian identity profiles between vegetarians and vegans. Food Qual Prefer. 2019;72:40-4.
National Academies of Sciences E and M. Sustainable Diets, Food, and Nutrition: Proceedings of a Workshop [Internet]. National Academies Press (US). 2019. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540293/
Sociedad vegetariana Brasilera. Pesquisa do IBOPE aponta crescimento histórico no número de vegetarianos no Brasil [Internet]. 2018. Disponible en: https://www.svb.org.br/2469-pesquisa-do-ibope-aponta-crescimento-historico-no-numero-de-vegetarianos-no-brasil
EUROMONITOR. Country report [Internet]. 2016. Disponible en: https://www.euromonitor.com/colombia
Betancourt C, Alfonso S. SECCU [Internet]. Universidad del Rosario; 2019. Disponible en: https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10336/20515/BetancourtToro-Catalina-2019 pdf.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Happy Cow. Vegan & Vegetarian Restaurants in South America. 2016. Obtenido de https://www.happycow.net/south_america/?filters=vegan.
Kyriakopoulou K, Dekkers B, van der Goot AJ. Plant-Based Meat Analogues [Internet]. Sustainable Meat Production and Processing. Elsevier Inc.; 2019. 103-126 p.
Bedin E, Torricelli C, Gigliano S, De Leo R, Pulvirenti A. Vegan foods: Mimic meat products in the Italian market. Int J Gastron Food Sci. 2018;13:1-9.
Baroni L, Goggi S, Battino M. Planning Well-Balanced Vegetarian Diets in Infants, Children, and Adolescents: The VegPlate Junior. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(7):1067-74.
Parales C. Representaciones sociales del comer saludablemente: un estudio empírico en Colombia. Univ Psychol. 2006;5(3):613-26.
Dietetics A of N and. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116:1970-80.
Cui X, Wang B, Wu Y, Xie L, Xun P, Tang Q, et al. Vegetarians have a lower fasting insulin level and higher insulin sensitivity than matched omnivores: A cross-sectional study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;29(5):467-73.
Tonstad S, Stewart K, Oda K, Batech M, Herring RP, Fraser GE. Vegetarian diets and incidence of diabetes in the Adventist Health Study-2. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;23(4):292-9.
Lin TJ, Tang SC, Liao PY, Dongoran RA, Yang JH, Liu CH. A comparison of L-carnitine and several cardiovascular-related biomarkers between healthy vegetarians and omnivores. Nutrition. 2019;66:29-37.
Garbett TM, Garbett DL, Wendorf AM. Vegetarian Diet: A Prescription for High Blood Pressure? A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Nurse Pract. 2016;12(7):452-458.e6.
Zhang Z, Ma G, Chen S, Li Z, Xia E, Sun YS, et al. Comparison of plasma triacylglycerol levels in vegetarians and omnivores: A meta-analysis. Nutrition. 2013;29(2):426-30.
Penniecook-Sawyers JA, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Fan J, Beeson L, Knutsen S, Herring P, et al. Vegetarian dietary patterns and the risk of breast cancer in a low-risk population. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(10):1790-7.
Rizzo NS, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Sabate J, Fraser GE. Nutrient Profiles of Vegetarian and Nonvegetarian Dietary Patterns. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(12):1610-9.
Rizzo NS, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Sabate J, Fraser GE. Nutrient Profiles of Vegetarian and Nonvegetarian Dietary Patterns. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(12):1610-9.
Menal-Puey S, Morán del Ruste M M-LI. Nutritional composition of common vegetarian food portions. 2016;33(2):386-94.
Sutter DO, Dtm&h F, Egger M, : C-A, Bender N. The impact of vegan diet on health and growth of children and adolescents – Literature review Master of Medicine ( M med ). Immatricul Nr. 2017;:3-800.
Pichler R. Vegetarian Food Products Labeling—An EU Perspective [Internet]. Reference Module in Food Science. Elsevier; 2017. 1-6 p.
AOAC. Official method 2001.11: protein (crude in animal feed, forage, grain and oilseeds [Internet]. 2001. Disponible en: https://img.21food.cn/img/biaozhun/20100108/177/11285182.pdf
AOAC. Official Method 920.39 (diethyl ether, traditional Soxhlet extraction): Crude Fat, Diethyl Ether Extraction, in Feed, Cereal Grain, and Forage (Randall/Soxtec/Submersion Method): Collaborative Study [Internet]. 2003. Disponible en: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9db9/171242339791596363479eea65ccd74dd3ba.pdf
CODEX. Directrices del CODEX frente al etiquetado nutricional [Internet]. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/3/y2770s/y2770s06.htm
AOAC. Standard N°AOAC 2011.14-2011: Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Potassium, Phosphorus, Sodium, and Zinc in Fortified Food Products. Microwave Digestion and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectromatry [Internet]. 2011. Disponible en: http://www.eoma.aoac.org/methods/info.asp?ID=49550
United States Department of Agriculture. USDA Food Composition Database [Internet]. Disponible en: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/
Colombia, Ministerio de protección social. Resolución 333, por la cual se establece el reglamento técnico sobre los requisitos de rotulado o etiquetado nutricional que deben cumplir los alimentos envasados para consumo humano. Colombia; 2011.
FSA. The UK Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model [Internet]. 2009. Disponible en: https://www.ndph.ox.ac.uk/food-ncd/files/about/uk-ofcom-nutrient-profile-model.pdf
Alcorta A, Porta A, Tárrega A, Alvarez MD, Vaquero MP. Foods for Plant-Based Diets: Challenges and Innovations. Foods. 2021;10(2):293.
Blanco-Gutiérrez I, Varela-Ortega C, Manners R. Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7969.
Angelino D, Rosi A, Vici G, Dello Russo M, Pellegrini N, Martini D. Nutritional Quality of Plant-Based Drinks Sold in Italy: The Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) Study. Foods. 25 de mayo de 2020;9(5):682.
Weaver CM, Proulx WR, Heaney R. Choices for achieving adequate dietary calcium with a vegetarian diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70(3):543s-548s.
Zhang YY, Hughes J, Grafenauer S. Got Mylk? The Emerging Role of Australian Plant-Based Milk Alternatives as A Cow’s Milk Substitute. Nutrients. 2020;12(5):1254.
Zhao Y, Martin BR, Weaver CM. Calcium Bioavailability of Calcium Carbonate Fortified Soymilk Is Equivalent to Cow’s Milk in Young Women. J Nutr. 2005;135(10):2379-82.
Curtain F, Grafenauer S. Plant-Based Meat Substitutes in the Flexitarian Age: An Audit of Products on Supermarket Shelves. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2603.
Fresán U, Mejia MA, Craig WJ, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Sabaté J. Meat Analogs from Different Protein Sources: A Comparison of Their Sustainability and Nutritional Content. Sustainability. 2019;11(12):3231.
De Marchi M, Costa A, Pozza M, Goi A, Manuelian CL. Detailed characterization of plant-based burgers. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2049.
Kumar P, Chatli MK, Mehta N, Singh P, Malav OP, Verma AK. Meat analogues: Health promising sustainable meat substitutes. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(5):923-32.
Elzerman JE, Hoek AC, van Boekel MAJS, Luning PA. Consumer acceptance and appropriateness of meat substitutes in a meal context. Food Qual Prefer. 2011;22(3):233-40.
European Parliament. Report 7.5.2019 [Internet]. 2019. Disponible en: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0198_EN.html#title2
Martin C, Lange C, Marette S. Importance of additional information, as a complement to information coming from packaging, to promote meat substitutes: A case study on a sausage based on vegetable proteins. Food Qual Prefer. enero de 2021;87:104058.
Lemken D, Spiller A, Schulze-Ehlers B. More room for legume – Consumer acceptance of meat substitution with classic, processed and meat-resembling legume products. Appetite. 2019;143:104412.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Briana Davahiva Gómez Ramirez, Maria Clara Echeverri Osorio, Adriana Margarita Rojas Pinilla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal 