Quality, diversity, and water footprint of the diet of nutrition professionals in Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.27.4.1995Keywords:
Food, Nutritionists, Sustainable Development Indicators, Water ResourcesAbstract
Introduction: Dietary patterns play a critical role in both human health and environmental impact, as they influence personal well-being and environmental sustainability. In this context, the objectives of the study were: i) Evaluate the perception and actual diet quality among nutrition professionals in Argentina, ii) Assess the dietary diversity of these professionals, iii) Estimate the water footprint associated with their food consumption, and iv) Compare the dietary water footprint of the participants with the recommendations proposed by the dietary guidelines of Argentina and the EAT-Lancet Commission.
Methods: An observational, descriptive, quantitative and cross-sectional study was conducted, collecting information from 170 Nutrition graduates in Argentina through a self-administered online questionnaire. The data were analyzed descriptively, and an ANOVA was applied to determine the existence of significant differences (p < 0.05) between the means of the dietary water footprint of the participants and the reference recommendations.
Results: The 80% of the participants perceived their diet to be of good quality, although 70% of them needed to make changes in their eating habits (69.5 points). Likewise, the majority (80%) showed a medium dietary diversity (5.0 points). The average dietary water footprint was 4,408.6 L/person/day, significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the recommendations suggested by the dietary guidelines and the EAT-Lancet Commission. The meat and egg group, along with the oils, seeds, and nuts group, were the main contributors to the daily water footprint.
Conclusions: The participating professionals need to modify their dietary practices to improve the quality and variety of their diet and, at the same time, reduce their water footprint.
References
(1) Springmann M, Clark MA, Rayner M, Scarborough P, Webb P. The global and regional costs of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns: a modelling study. Lancet Planet Health. 2021;5(11):e797-e807, doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00251-5.
(2) FAO y OMS. Dietas saludables sostenibles: Principios rectores [Internet]. Roma, Italia; 2020. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4060/ca6640es.
(3) García-Herrero L, Gibin D, Damiani M, Sanyé-Mengual E, Sala S. What is the water footprint of EU food consumption? A comparison of water footprint assessment methods. J. Clean. Prod. 2023;415:137807, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137807
(4) Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. London: Earthscan and Colombo: International Water Management Institute, 2007.
(5) Willett W, Rockstrom J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Madera A, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet. 2019; (393): 447–492, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
(6) Chaudhary A, Gustafson D, Mathys A. Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nat. Comunitario. 2018;9(848), doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03308-7
(7) Springmann M, Clark M, Mason-D'Croz D, Wiebe K, Bodirsky BL, Lassaletta L, de Vries W, Vermeulen SJ, Herrero M, Carlson KM, Jonell M, Troell M, DeClerck F, Gordon LJ, Zurayk R, Scarborough P, Rayner M, Loken B, Fanzo J, Godfray HCJ, Tilman D, Rockström J, Willett W. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature. 2018;562(7728):519-525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
(8) Milner J, Green R, Dangour AD, Haines A, Chalabi Z, Spadaro J, Markandya A, Wilkinson P. Health effects of adopting low greenhouse gas emission diets in the UK. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e007364, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007364
(9) 4° Encuesta Nacional de Factores de Riesgo (ENFR) [Internet]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC) y Secretaría de Gobierno de Salud de la Nación; 2019. Disponible en: https://www.indec.gob.ar/ftp/cuadros/publicaciones/enfr_2018_resultados_definitivos.pdf.
(10) Gil A, Martínez de Victoria E, Olza J. Indicadores de evaluación de la calidad de la dieta. Revista española de Nutrición Comunitaria. 2015;21(1):127-143, doi: 10.14642/RENC.2015.21.sup1.5060.
(11) 2° Encuesta Nacional de Nutrición y Salud (ENNyS 2) [Internet]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Secretaría de Gobierno de Salud del Ministerio de Salud y Desarrollo Social; 2019. Disponible en: https://cesni-biblioteca.org/2-encuesta-nacional-de-nutricion-y-salud-ennys-2-resumen-ejecutivo/.
(12) Guías Alimentarias para la Población Argentina (GAPA) [Internet]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ministerio de Salud de la Nación; 2020. Disponible en: http://www.msal.gob.ar/images/stories/bes/graficos/0000001007cnt-2017-06_guia-alimentaria-poblacion-argentina.pdf.
(13) Vanham D, Guenther S, Ros-Baró M, Bach-Faig A. Which diet has the lower water footprint in Mediterranean countries?. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021; 105631, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105631.
(14) Comisión EAT-Lancet. Dietas saludables a partir de sistemas alimentarios sostenibles: Alimentos, Planeta y Salud [Internet]. Oslo, Noruega; 2019. Disponible en: https://eatforum.org/content/uploads/2019/04/EAT-Lancet_Commission_Summary_Report_Spanish.pdf.
(15) Zapata ME, Méndez IA, Fassano MV. Tendencias en la calidad de dieta de los hogares argentinos entre 1996-2018, diferencias según región, tipo de hogar y nivel de ingreso. Rev. Salud Pública. 2022;28(2), doi:10.31052/1853.1180.v2.n28.37565.
(16) Soares P, Almendra-Pegueros R, Benítez-Brito N, Fernández-Villa T, Lozano-Lorca M, Valera-Gran D, Navarrete-Muñoz EM. Sistemas alimentarios sostenibles para una alimentación saludable. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet. 2020; 24(2): 87-9, doi: 10.14306/renhyd.24.2.1058.
(17) Zapata ME, Buffarini R, Lingiardi N, Gonçalves-Soares AL. Reproducibilidad y validación relativa de un cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo de alimentos semicuantitativo en población adulta de Rosario, Argentina. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet. 2015;19(4):227-30, doi: 10.14306/renhyd.19.4.177.
(18) Méndez I, Fasano, MV. Desarrollo y validación de un Índice de Calidad de Dieta basado en recomendaciones de las Guías Alimentarias para la Población Argentina. Rev Argent Salud Pública. 2023;15:e94. Disponible en: https://rasp.msal.gov.ar/index.php/rasp/article/view/814.
(19) Sistema de Análisis y Registro de Alimentos (SARA) [Internet]. SARA 2: Tabla de composición química de alimentos para Argentina: Compilación para ENNyS 2. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ministerio de Salud de la Nación; 2022. Disponible en: https://bancos.salud.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2022-09/tabla-composicion-quimica-alimentos-argentina_ennys2.pdf.
(20) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). [Internet]. Food Data Central. [citado el 11 de julio de 2023]. Disponible en: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/.
(21) Bowman SA, Clemens JC, Friday JE, Thoerig RC, Moshfegh AJ. Food Patterns Equivalents Database 2011-12: Methodology and User Guide [Internet]. Maryland, United States: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service; 2014. Disponible en: http://www.ars.usda.gov/nea/bhnrc/fsrg.
(22) FAO. Guía para medir la diversidad alimentaria a nivel individual y del hogar [Internet]. Roma, Italia; 2013. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/3/i1983s/i1983s00.htm.
(23) Water Footprint Network [Internet]. Product water footprint. [citado el 11 de julio de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.waterfootprint.org/.
(24) Fellegger Garzillo MJ, Pereira Machado P, da Costa Louzada ML, Bertazzi Levy R, Monteiro CA. Footprints of foods and culinary preparations consumed in Brazil. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo; 2019. Disponible en: https://www.livrosabertos.sibi.usp.br/portaldelivrosUSP/catalog/download/442/394/1603?inline=1.
(25) Water Footprint Network [Internet]. How to Calculate the Water Footprint of any Food [citado el 11 de julio de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.waterfootprint.org/resources/PDFHowtoCalculatetheWaterFootprintofanyFood.pdf.
(26) Schifferli-Castro I, Cofré-Jara S, Soto-Rodríguez F, Soto-Rodríguez L, Vargas-Nuñez K. Calidad de la dieta del personal de salud de un hospital chileno según el índice de alimentación saludable. Rev Fac Med 2020;68 (4), 512-6, doi:10.15446/revfacmed.v68n4.76500.
(27) Martínez-Bebia M, Latorre JA, Giménez-Blasi N, Anaya-Loyola MA, López-Moro A et al. Variedad en la calidad de la dieta en adultos españoles y mexicanos. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición. 2021;71(2), 127-137, doi: 10.37527/2021.71.2.005.
(28) López Torres LP, Navia B, Ortega RM. Percepción sobre la calidad de la dieta en un colectivo de adultos. Comparación con la calidad real. Nutrición Clín y Diet Hosp. 2017; 37(2), 75-82, doi: 10.12873/372lopez.
(29) Fortino A, Vargas M, Berta E, Cuneo F y Ávila O. Valoración de los patrones de consumo alimentario y actividad física en universitarios de tres carreras respecto a las guías alimentarias para la población argentina. Rev Chil Nutr. 2020; 47(6), 906-915, doi:10.4067/S0717-75182020000600906
(30) Gómez G, Fisberg R, Nogueira Previdelli Á, Hermes Sales C, Kovalskys I, Fisberg M, et al. Diet Quality and Diet Diversity in Eight Latin American Countries: Results from the Latin American Study of Nutrition and Health (ELANS). Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1605, doi: 10.3390/nu11071605.
(31) Harry F, Moss C, Joy EJM, Quinn R Scheelbeek PFD, Dangour AD y Green R. The Water Footprint of Diets: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Advances in Nutrition. 2020;11(2):375-386, doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz091.
(32) Mekonnen M, Hoekstra A. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems. 2012;15(3):401–15, doi: 10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8.
(33) Arrieta EM, Geri M, Coquet JB, Scavuzzo CM, Zapata ME, et al. Quality and environmental footprints of diets by socio-economic status in Argentina. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;801, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149686.
(34) Arrieta E, González A, Fernández R. Dietas saludables y sustentables, ¿Son posibles en la Argentina?. Ecología Austral. 2021; 31:148-169, doi: 10.25260/EA.21.31.1.0.1096.
(35) Cambeses-Franco C, Feijoo G, Moreira MT y González-García S. Co-benefits of the EAT-Lancet diet for environmental protection in the framework of the Spanish dietary pattern. Science of the Total Environment. 2022; 836(25): 155683, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155683.
(36) FAO. Platos, pirámides y planeta: Novedades en el desarrollo de guías alimentarias nacionales para una alimentación saludable y sostenible: evaluación del estado de la situación [Internet]. Roma, Italia; 2018. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/fr/c/I5640ES/.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 María Sol Telis, María Agustina Borgo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal 