Characterization of meat product consumption in a college population of Medellin, Colombia

Authors

  • Holmes Rodríguez Grupo de Investigación GaMMA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Antioquía.
  • Luis Fernando Restrepo Grupo de Investigación GISER, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Antioquía.
  • Luz Amparo Urango Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Universidad de Antioquía.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.19.2.147

Keywords:

Meat, College students, Socioeconomic status, Nutrition knowledge, Food preferences, Consumption habits

Abstract

Introduction: Study of healthy lifestyles in college students, is part of institutional strategies to reduce prevalence of overweight and obesity. For this reason, the aim of this research was to characterize the consumption and knowledge of university students at Medellin, Colombia, related to consumption of meat products.

Material and Methods: Sample size was 400 students, randomly selected according to the factors: gender, socioeconomic status and type of university (public or private), considering a confidence level of 95% and a maximum permissible error of 5%.

Results: Chicken meat followed by fish as preferred meat, was found, lamb is the least preferred; higher consumption in males of fish, rabbit and goat was found (p<0.05). With regard to preferences about meat, higher preference by men (p<0.05) and by public universities (p <0.0001) was found. About meat nutritional value’s knowledge, higher levels in women than men was found (p<0.05); students from lower socioeconomic status have the least knowledge about the properties of meat (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Considering the low awareness of college students on the importance of eating meat, to implement education programs and intervention to improve dietary habits is necessary.

Author Biography

Holmes Rodríguez, Grupo de Investigación GaMMA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Antioquía.

Ingeniero Agrícola, MSc. PhD.
Profesor Asistente
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias

References

(1) Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar, Ministerio de la Protección Social, Instituto Nacional de Salud & Profamilia. Encuesta Nacional de la Situación Nutricional en Colombia 2010. 1–512; 2011.

(2) Roos G, Lean M, Anderson A. Dietary interventions in Finland, Norway and Sweden: nutrition policies and strategies. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2002; 15(2): 99–110.

(3) Ortiz–Moncada R, Norte Navarro AI, Zaragoza Marti A, Fernández Sáez J, Davó Blanes MC. ¿Siguen patrones de dieta mediterránea los universitarios españoles? Nutr Hosp. 2012; 27(6): 1952–9.

(4) Troncoso C, Amaya JP. Factores sociales en las conductas alimentarias de estudiantes universitarios. Rev Chil Nutr. 2009; 36(4): 1090–7

(5) Becerra–Bulla F, Pinzón–Villate G, Várgas–Zárate M. Estado nutricional y consumo de alimentos de estudiantes universitarios admitidos a la carrera de medicina Bogotá 2010–2011. Rev Fac Med. 2012; 60: 3–12.

(6) Schnettler B, Miranda H, Sepúlveda J, Denegri M. Satisfacción con la alimentación y la vida, un estudio exploratorio en estudiantes de la universidad de la frontera, Temuco–Chile. Psicol e Soc. 2011; 23(2), 426–35.

(7) Montero Bravo A, Ubeda Martín N, García González A. Evaluation of dietary habits of a population of university students in relation with their nutritional knowledge. Nutr Hosp. 2006; 21(4): 466–73.

(8) Schnettler B, Denegri M, Miranda H, Sepúlveda J, Orellana L, Paiva G, et al. Hábitos alimentarios y bienestar subjetivo en estudiantes universitarios del sur de Chile. Nutr Hosp. 2013; 28(6): 2221–8.

(9) Rizo–Baeza MM, González–Brauer NG, Cortés E. Calidad de la dieta y estilos de vida en estudiantes de Ciencias de la Salud. Nutr Hosp. 2014; 29(1): 153–7.

(10) Cervera Burriel F, Serrano Urrea R, Vico García C, Milla Tobarra M, García Meseguer MJ. Hábitos alimentarios y evaluación nutricional en una población universitaria. Nutr Hosp. 2013; 28(2): 438–46.

(11) Arrivillaga M, Salazar IC, Correa D. Creencias sobre la salud y su relación con las prácticas de riesgo o de protección en jóvenes universitarios. Colomb Med. 2003; 34(4), 186–95.

(12) Albisu LM, Gracia A. La demanda de productos cárnicos y pescados en España, aplicación de un sistema de demanda casi ideal (AIDS). Investig Agrar. 1995; 2: 233–52 .

(13) Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Sistema Nacional de Información de la Educación Superior. Disponible en: http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/sistemasdeinformacion/1735/w3-article-212400.html

(14) Li KK, Concepcion RY, Lee H, Cardinal BJ, Ebbeck V, Woekel E, Readdy RT. An examination of sex differences in relation to the eating habits and nutrient intakes of university students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012; 44(3): 246–50.

(15) Guagliardo V, Lions C, Darmon N, Verger P. Eating at the university canteen. Associations with socioeconomic status and healthier self–reported eating habits in France. Appetite. 2011; 56(1): 90–5.

(16) Murphy KJ, Parker B, Dyer KA, Davis CR, Coates AM, Buckley JD, et al. A comparison of regular consumption of fresh lean pork, beef and chicken on body composition: a randomized cross–over trial. Nutrients. 2014; 6(2): 682–96.

(17) Schnettler B, Miranda H, Sepúlveda J, Denegri M, Mora M, Lobos G. Satisfacción con la alimentación en personas Mapuche de la región de la Araucania, Chile. Rev Chil Nutr. 2012; 39(1): 18–29.

(18) Vargas–Zárate M, Becerra–Bulla F, Prieto–Suárez E. Evaluación de la ingesta dietética en estudiantes universitarios. Bogotá, Colombia. Rev Salud Pública. 2010; 12(1): 116–25.

(19) El Ansari W, Stock C, Mikolajczyk RT. Relationships between food consumption and living arrangements among university students in four European countries – a cross–sectional study. Nutr J. 2012; 11: 28.

(20) Araya–Quesada Y, Jiménez–Robles A, Ivankovich–Guillén C, García–Barquero M. Hábitos de consumo de embutidos en el cantón de San Carlos y el área metropolitana de Costa Rica. Tecnol en Marcha. 2014; 27(4): 113–24.

(21) Restrepo LF, Urango LA, Deossa GC. Conocimiento y factores asociados al consumo de frutas por estudiantes universitarios de la ciudad de Medellín, Colombia. Rev Chil Nutr. 2014; 41(3): 236–42.

(22) Mead E, Gittelsohn J, Roache C, Sharma S. Healthy food intentions and higher socioeconomic status are associated with healthier food choices in an Inuit population. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010; 23(Suppl 1): 83–91.

(23) Morse KL, Driskell JA. Observed sex differences in fast–food consumption and nutrition self–assessments and beliefs of college students. Nutr Res. 2009; 29(3): 173–9.

(24) Tanaka M, Mizuno K, Fukuda S, Shigihara Y, Watanabe Y. Relationships between dietary habits and the prevalence of fatigue in medical students. Nutrition. 2008; 24(10): 985–9.

(25) Liu C, Xie B, Chou CP, Koprowski C, Zhou D, Palmer P, et al. Perceived stress, depression and food consumption frequency in the college students of China Seven Cities. Physiol Behav. 2007; 92(4): 748–54.

(26) Papier K, Ahmed F, Lee P, Wiseman J. Stress and dietary behaviour among first–year university students in Australia: sex differences. Nutrition. 2015; 31(2): 324–30.

(27) Cousineau TM, Franko DL, Ciccazzo M, Goldstein M, Rosenthal E. Web–based nutrition education for college students: Is it feasible? Eval Program Plann. 2006; 29(1): 23–33.

(28) Driskell JA, Kim YN, Goebel KJ. Few differences found in the typical eating and physical activity habits of lower–level and upper–level university students. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005; 105(5): 798–801.

(29) Cooke R, Papadaki A. Nutrition label use mediates the positive relationship between nutrition knowledge and attitudes towards healthy eating with dietary quality among university students in the UK. Appetite. 2014; 83: 297–303.

Published

2015-05-04

How to Cite

Rodríguez, H., Restrepo, L. F., & Urango, L. A. (2015). Characterization of meat product consumption in a college population of Medellin, Colombia. Spanish Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 19(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.19.2.147